Some books I read, May 2022

 Scorched Earth: Jonathan Crary

The author of this text really does not like modernity. And in this book he explains why. I think the only real problem with it is that he talks about the inevitable post-capitalist future but he doesn't really align with any sort of positive post-capitalist future. With path dependency it's hard to see how we go from here to anything good. Perhaps it will be in his next text.

Undoing the Demos: Wendy Brown

Before I say anything about the content of this book I think I need to say something about the physical nature of it. For some reason the Press decided to make it about an inch wider than a normal paperback should be so that it's really awkward to read.

As for the content, it's pretty good. Basically she tracks a social shift from a political creature to an economic creature on the broader umbrella of what neoliberalism is. My only real complaint is that it might lean a little too heavily on Foucault. I kept joking to myself when I was reading the difference between economics as a discipline as it exists and everything else is that economics doesn't mention Foucault, but once you mention Foucault they become sociology. I feel as if the work in her argument gets stronger towards the end as she leans less heavily on Foucault directly and develops her own evidence. Definitely worth reading but it took a minute to get through.

Squire: Sara Alfageeh & Nadia Shammas

Squire is a cute little story about a young girl who comes from a subordinate class in an Empire. To gain citizenship and to have Adventure she joins the army but over the course of the text she realizes that these Adventures and the violence that's part of it are too much. So what you end up here is an anti-war book starring a young girl and her friend group. It's not too didactic and I would say overall it works..

Dead Dog’s Bite: Tyler Boss

This book is kind of like a small town murder mystery where people are going missing and the main character is trying to uncover what's going on. It's not bad, just not really memorable. I'd say it's got some Shirley Jackson The Lottery vibes.

Fine: Rhea Ewing

I have a sense that gender is like sexuality and that it is a spectrum but also that it is fluid and that it could change over time. But also that how we talk about gender is also shaped by what's available in the culture. Trying to figure out who you are is a huge part of growing up and I think it's good that right now at least in the culture we're allowed to talk about where we fit in instead of trying to shove everything down. It's probably healthier psychologically for everybody involved. In this graphic examination Ewing Interviews a number of people about their own experience with gender over time. It's not systemic or scientific but it's a good journalistic examination. And I think that it's good that they did it in a graphic form so that it's more accessible than someone having to go pull Judith Butler off the shelf. The reader can see there are all sorts of types of gender expressions available to them and they are not stuck into a hard-and-fast binary. And this goes for everybody, not just anyone who might be questioning their own gender expressions. I think we'd all be best served if we understood that there isn't a hard-and-fast binary.

Hyperion: Dan Simmons

I came across this book when I was researching my Master's thesis on science fiction. It was mentioned that there was a book structured like the Canterbury Tales and I thought that was interesting. I have some mixed emotions about this text. because it is kind of like the Canterbury Tales in that there are pilgrims going to a place and they're telling a tale. The difference is that all the tales the pilgrims are telling here are related to the larger frame story. so there is more thematic coherence. 

I think the problem is that the larger frame story is kind of interesting in itself but I don't know if the structure that the author chose is the best way to develop the idea he had. Additionally, only a couple of the Pilgrim's Tales are actually interesting. It's a real slog to read as you transition from one story to another. He does some stuff with making each of the individual stories such that they could be stand-alone novellas. Two of them really work like that, and one doesn't fully rely on the frame story at all. So it's like this really ambitious book that doesn't fully come together. Finally. I think the worst sin of all for me is that it doesn't resolve within one text. So instead of a coherent novel it really more feels like a setup to a series and I'm not interested in reading more of the series. 

The Seven Beauties of Science Fiction: Istvan Csicsey-Ronay Jr.

I really enjoyed the Seven Beauties of Science Fiction. It is a book of theory but it also has little bits of how the author would apply the theory to different texts and it shows how his theoretical concepts apply in practice. It's a very beautiful way of going about it. I think what was best for me is that he really gave me a vocabulary to describe and criticize science fiction in a academic manner. There are a lot of themes and tropes and characters and settings n that are present in science fiction that don't really have a place of your come from a place of criticism of realistic fiction,  and so it gives you a way to talk about it. This is the book I would give anybody who was trying to write a paper or to think more critically about science fiction. It's a very good starting place and you'll be glad you read it.

Mistaken Identity: Asad Haider

This book, when it comes down to it, is more than anything a call to solidarity across whatever traditional identity category you might draw. I think it is important because a lot of times as he points out that whatever these categories are drawn by the oppressor so that we really need to make sure we have solidarity because the world is hard and it's relentless.

SQLBI

 

On The End of Policing by Alex Vitale

 

I have this book here, and it’s good.

What’s weird is that it was written in 2017. So, this book is just a rundown of why we’ve moved past the need for policing and how it is bad for society in its current form and even in its history it was never good.

It feels like a response to the protests of 2020, but it wasn’t.

Sometimes you read a book and it is really grounded in its time and place, but this was timely a few years ago and is even more timely now. It is amazing how you have internalized and normalized the way that policing happens in this country, the good old United States. You don’t really think about all the contradictions unless you are at the sharp end of the stick, or you are paid to study it.

But it’s not good and it doesn’t really keep us safer and is just more or less designed to protect property over people. It’s sad and even sadder knowing how entrenched it is so that even the mildest reforms are met with howls of indignation not just by those who wield the stick, but the oppressed as well.

Recent Reads Late September

 The Spoils of War – Andrew Cockburn

 

Reading these essays did remind me of having read them before, since a couple of them I know I already read in Harpers. But it’s worth it because what Cockburn does show just so many ways that the foreign policy priorities of the last 20 years goes against what should be our national priorities. Mainly it’s an appalling list of how many ways we direct our resources to stupid priorities and how these resources are poorly spent even with those priorities. Not only do we spend on the wrong things, but we also don’t even do it well. Well written and will make you justly angry.

 

 

The Souls of Black Folk – Du Bois

 

Du Boise was writing after the general failure of Reconstruction and reading this made me want to go deeper on the reconstruction history, especially the failure of the Freedman’s Bank. It’s just a throwaway paragraph, but it seems like a real important turning point to me. A lot of the essays are interesting as history, and there’s the sad thing where a lot of them still feel relevant and pertinent. However, others feel alien, talking about specific concerns that may have been forgotten. The style is interesting. It’s almost uncanny – like the cadences are off for a modern reader, maybe it is based on a then-current speaking style or something. This book is an important bridge from the postwar era to the rebirth of the civil rights era.

 

A World Without Police – Maher

 

This is one of those books that kind of go into greater detail on things you already know and just say it more fluently and with greater detail. The policing and justice system are interrelated with so much of the current social structure and it’s broken (as is the current political and economic system). Maher will teach you just how this is broken and calls strongly for abolition. What’s really important here is that it just isn’t a utopian idea. What Maher calls for is greater community involvement shows examples how different places have worked though abolition of this incredibly broken system, from police on the streets to the broader incarceration system.

 

Feminist Antifascism – Majewska

 

I’ve been reading more theory lately, and a lot of it does do that thing where it is written in a way that feels deliberately obtuse stylistically. Thankfully, Majewska does not do that here. Her book calls for important third places against fascism and for feminism (thus the title and subtitle). However, what this book does do is assume familiarity of the reader for a lot of different other theorists. There’s a section on 131-2 that just drops the names of 10 different theorists and though I have heard of most of them she didn’t really even give a shorthand of the ideas of all of them. Partly on me, but it makes following along a bit harder. What’s weird is that there’s a chapter on the Polish Solidarity movement where she goes over the movement’s history and I think that because she isn’t assuming that people know that history she goes into detail and though it is more alien to me, it is the most successful essay of the book. Overall, another interesting offering from Verso but had some hurdles for me.

 

 

 

I Read Some Descartes

 I dropped my only philosophy class in college because it was one of those huge lecture halls and the professor was not a good lecturer. He spent the lectures talking to the board and the first book in the syllabus was a book on string theory. I get what he was doing now but I wanted Plato.

 

So, I’ve been circling back around and trying to get a grounding in some of the foundations of western thought. For that I really like these thin Hackett books – accessible and not over-whelming.

 

Some interesting things that I came across here is that the two things that Descartes is most famous for, the Cogito Ergo Sum and the mind / body duality are literally in back-to-back paragraphs in the Discourse. He seems to be arguing to take everything from first principles, and it is an interesting path on one hand but on the other seems to deny all prior learning and feels a bit solipsistic. Only I can determine what is real and true. It’s whatever the opposite of standing on the shoulders of giants is.

 

The thing that strikes me is if he does that, it seems he doesn’t go far enough. There are multiple assumptions built into Cogito Ergo Sum, basically what the singular is, what thinking is, what being is, and what causation is. You really need to define all these before you stop at thinking. I could be missing something, or it could just be that the bar was way lower back then.

 

The other thing is that a huge part of the second book is trying to prove the existence of God, but it really feels to me like he basically makes an assumption about what God’s nature is like and then says it must be so. I wasn’t convinced.

Recent reads 8.6.2021

 The Relentless Moon

 

The Relentless Moon is the third in a series of alternate history books that basically look at what would happen if sometime in the 1950s a giant asteroid hit the earth and wiped out most of the eastern seaboard of America.  What the combined governments of the nation decide to do is create a space race to get to space and get on the moon and get on Mars. They do this because they have a theory that the aftereffects of the asteroid impact which first created essentially nuclear winter will turn around and become a runaway greenhouse effect. I don't know if the science behind this is true. But will take that precipitating event at face value.

 

For me of all the series it's those first 50 pages that are most interesting. For some reason I still don't really buy the idea that they would turn around a create a space race when there was no real existing technology for it. Even now with the technology we have over half a century later colonizing the moon or Mars seems like a huge effort. So, in the book they're spending huge amounts of resources on an effort that sounds like a really wouldn't save a lot of people. What's interesting is that there is within the text of the book a group of people who are fighting against this project because it is a waste of resources and they'd rather spent the effort of the governments on earth. The other part that really doesn't seem to work is that after the after impact everyone starts working together. On a country-to-country basis for me it would seem to be agree catastrophe would be something that pushes us towards conflict and not word unity, which she was especially prevalent in the face of the pandemic. I think the author may have wanted to use this as a metaphor for global warming writ large, but we've had a more concentrated global emergency that kind of throws away the foundation of her thought in the book.

 

The thing is this is the third book that I have read the series. So, what I'm thinking about the book and the series itself I think “Hey why am I attracted to this series?” because normally if I had these kinds of qualms about the basis of a story I probably wouldn't keep reading. And the more I think of it I think what really drives my interest is the characters. Kowal creates characters very well and they're interesting they have flaws. It's a very feminist book so there's still fighting against a lot of gender and racial norms that existed. The other thing is that this book focuses on a different character than the previous two books do so as a reader it took a minute to get into it since you had to get the grounding with these main characters in her life. Overall though she tells good stories and I keep reading the books so I have to say there's something good going on there even if I can't fully articulate it.

 

 

The Last Man Takes LSD

I went to Graduate School in English about 20 years ago. Somehow, I didn't have to read much Foucault. I think I read Discipline and Punish but only on my own time.  We may have read some sort of excerpts in a larger theory class. But that doesn't mean I'm not kind of familiar with the concepts of the man because the postmodern, post-structuralist thinking, that he helped engineer was everywhere at the Academy at that time. Even if you were more structural, Marxist or something that wasn't as grounded in French theory you still had to deal with that environment.

 

That basically means that I don't have the full context to completely judge this book because it is somewhat of a biography and somewhat of an intellectual biography but also a criticism of his work. So, reading this I learned a lot about Foucault and his thought and the things he was involved in. But I can't say where the authors got it right where they got it wrong how much he was involved in the creation and strengthening and dissemination of what we now call neoliberalism. What I can say is that the subtitle means more to the structure of the book than the title. There is sadly very little about LSD and it's more about the fizzling out of revolutionary potentials. I'm glad I read this book and I think I learned a lot from it.

 

Recent Reads 8.4.2021

 Red State Revolt

The Jacobin and Verso partnership published a book based on the Chicago teachers strikes a while back. And then after 2018 they published a book about the broader teachers strikes that struck the nation. This is that book.

 

I really liked what Eric Blanc does mainly because even though he gets up close to the people who really worked with the strikes he doesn't over invest in them which for me would be very easy to do as a non-journalist. But you still do get a lot of empathy for the people. What makes this strong is his comparison of the strikes in West Virginia and Arizona versus the ones in Oklahoma. It makes it like points of comparison which could be useful as a handbook for future work.

 

The thing that makes me sad reading this is thinking about all the promise that we had based on Bernie’s run in 2016 and then the teacher strikes in 2018 and then it felt like a letdown as a member of the left that we didn't get more progress especially considering the pandemic. Reading it just felt as if we had something within our grasp that slipped away a moment in time in the ebbs and flows where you hope you could strike wear the iron is hot, but you miss. And it's not missing that's sad.

 

Puppy Dog Ice Cream

 

I don't normally buy a book that would be a biography of a band. But when I was a little bit younger Japanther became my favorite band. The problem was that the time that I was becoming a big fan of them it was at the very end of their cycle. I saw them at Riot Fest and then once later and then I had tickets for a show in the spring of 2014 and then I got an email that said they weren't going to do that tour. It made me very sad, and I didn't know why it happened.

 

So, the thing was getting this book and seeing it offered - I was excited at long last to see an explanation about what happened. My hope was that I would get an entire view of the whole arc of the band. Which is pretty much what this book’s got so that's good. The problem is that as a reader and a story once most interesting is the conflict period and what we have here is Ian's side of the whole thing and we don't really get mad side. So, the subtitle is the story of Japanther, but it's only half the story. I enjoyed reading it was a quick read, but I would like the sequel if it were Matt story of Japanther.

 

I don't mean to disparage what Ian did because the book itself is very well written and I think he is introspective and insightful about his own experience. I think if you were a fan of the band, you would enjoy this book.

 

The Secret to Superhuman Strength

 

I have been reading Allison Bechdel’s work for a while. It started with Fun Home, but I also circled back and read her comics. I think especially in her books Bechdel isn't necessarily just writing about the subject matter at hand. What she's really writing about is herself and her own inner journey. Nominally it could be about her mom or her dad or her lifelong exploration of different kinds of exercise, but really, it's just a journey inward looking at the self. Overall, it's not a bad journey and there's a very good reason that she is an award-winning author and artist -- it's that she really touches the soul, or the nub, she gets to the root of the problem. I don't know. Whatever it is that she does she's very good at it. If you like graphic novels and you like memoirs you are going to like The Secret to Superhuman Strength.

 

The only quibble I have is that I read the whole thing and I don't think I found what the secret was. But I do have to admit to sometimes being an inattentive reader, so perhaps it's in there and I just missed it.