On The End of Policing by Alex Vitale

 

I have this book here, and it’s good.

What’s weird is that it was written in 2017. So, this book is just a rundown of why we’ve moved past the need for policing and how it is bad for society in its current form and even in its history it was never good.

It feels like a response to the protests of 2020, but it wasn’t.

Sometimes you read a book and it is really grounded in its time and place, but this was timely a few years ago and is even more timely now. It is amazing how you have internalized and normalized the way that policing happens in this country, the good old United States. You don’t really think about all the contradictions unless you are at the sharp end of the stick, or you are paid to study it.

But it’s not good and it doesn’t really keep us safer and is just more or less designed to protect property over people. It’s sad and even sadder knowing how entrenched it is so that even the mildest reforms are met with howls of indignation not just by those who wield the stick, but the oppressed as well.

Recent Reads Late September

 The Spoils of War – Andrew Cockburn

 

Reading these essays did remind me of having read them before, since a couple of them I know I already read in Harpers. But it’s worth it because what Cockburn does show just so many ways that the foreign policy priorities of the last 20 years goes against what should be our national priorities. Mainly it’s an appalling list of how many ways we direct our resources to stupid priorities and how these resources are poorly spent even with those priorities. Not only do we spend on the wrong things, but we also don’t even do it well. Well written and will make you justly angry.

 

 

The Souls of Black Folk – Du Bois

 

Du Boise was writing after the general failure of Reconstruction and reading this made me want to go deeper on the reconstruction history, especially the failure of the Freedman’s Bank. It’s just a throwaway paragraph, but it seems like a real important turning point to me. A lot of the essays are interesting as history, and there’s the sad thing where a lot of them still feel relevant and pertinent. However, others feel alien, talking about specific concerns that may have been forgotten. The style is interesting. It’s almost uncanny – like the cadences are off for a modern reader, maybe it is based on a then-current speaking style or something. This book is an important bridge from the postwar era to the rebirth of the civil rights era.

 

A World Without Police – Maher

 

This is one of those books that kind of go into greater detail on things you already know and just say it more fluently and with greater detail. The policing and justice system are interrelated with so much of the current social structure and it’s broken (as is the current political and economic system). Maher will teach you just how this is broken and calls strongly for abolition. What’s really important here is that it just isn’t a utopian idea. What Maher calls for is greater community involvement shows examples how different places have worked though abolition of this incredibly broken system, from police on the streets to the broader incarceration system.

 

Feminist Antifascism – Majewska

 

I’ve been reading more theory lately, and a lot of it does do that thing where it is written in a way that feels deliberately obtuse stylistically. Thankfully, Majewska does not do that here. Her book calls for important third places against fascism and for feminism (thus the title and subtitle). However, what this book does do is assume familiarity of the reader for a lot of different other theorists. There’s a section on 131-2 that just drops the names of 10 different theorists and though I have heard of most of them she didn’t really even give a shorthand of the ideas of all of them. Partly on me, but it makes following along a bit harder. What’s weird is that there’s a chapter on the Polish Solidarity movement where she goes over the movement’s history and I think that because she isn’t assuming that people know that history she goes into detail and though it is more alien to me, it is the most successful essay of the book. Overall, another interesting offering from Verso but had some hurdles for me.

 

 

 

I Read Some Descartes

 I dropped my only philosophy class in college because it was one of those huge lecture halls and the professor was not a good lecturer. He spent the lectures talking to the board and the first book in the syllabus was a book on string theory. I get what he was doing now but I wanted Plato.

 

So, I’ve been circling back around and trying to get a grounding in some of the foundations of western thought. For that I really like these thin Hackett books – accessible and not over-whelming.

 

Some interesting things that I came across here is that the two things that Descartes is most famous for, the Cogito Ergo Sum and the mind / body duality are literally in back-to-back paragraphs in the Discourse. He seems to be arguing to take everything from first principles, and it is an interesting path on one hand but on the other seems to deny all prior learning and feels a bit solipsistic. Only I can determine what is real and true. It’s whatever the opposite of standing on the shoulders of giants is.

 

The thing that strikes me is if he does that, it seems he doesn’t go far enough. There are multiple assumptions built into Cogito Ergo Sum, basically what the singular is, what thinking is, what being is, and what causation is. You really need to define all these before you stop at thinking. I could be missing something, or it could just be that the bar was way lower back then.

 

The other thing is that a huge part of the second book is trying to prove the existence of God, but it really feels to me like he basically makes an assumption about what God’s nature is like and then says it must be so. I wasn’t convinced.

Recent reads 8.6.2021

 The Relentless Moon

 

The Relentless Moon is the third in a series of alternate history books that basically look at what would happen if sometime in the 1950s a giant asteroid hit the earth and wiped out most of the eastern seaboard of America.  What the combined governments of the nation decide to do is create a space race to get to space and get on the moon and get on Mars. They do this because they have a theory that the aftereffects of the asteroid impact which first created essentially nuclear winter will turn around and become a runaway greenhouse effect. I don't know if the science behind this is true. But will take that precipitating event at face value.

 

For me of all the series it's those first 50 pages that are most interesting. For some reason I still don't really buy the idea that they would turn around a create a space race when there was no real existing technology for it. Even now with the technology we have over half a century later colonizing the moon or Mars seems like a huge effort. So, in the book they're spending huge amounts of resources on an effort that sounds like a really wouldn't save a lot of people. What's interesting is that there is within the text of the book a group of people who are fighting against this project because it is a waste of resources and they'd rather spent the effort of the governments on earth. The other part that really doesn't seem to work is that after the after impact everyone starts working together. On a country-to-country basis for me it would seem to be agree catastrophe would be something that pushes us towards conflict and not word unity, which she was especially prevalent in the face of the pandemic. I think the author may have wanted to use this as a metaphor for global warming writ large, but we've had a more concentrated global emergency that kind of throws away the foundation of her thought in the book.

 

The thing is this is the third book that I have read the series. So, what I'm thinking about the book and the series itself I think “Hey why am I attracted to this series?” because normally if I had these kinds of qualms about the basis of a story I probably wouldn't keep reading. And the more I think of it I think what really drives my interest is the characters. Kowal creates characters very well and they're interesting they have flaws. It's a very feminist book so there's still fighting against a lot of gender and racial norms that existed. The other thing is that this book focuses on a different character than the previous two books do so as a reader it took a minute to get into it since you had to get the grounding with these main characters in her life. Overall though she tells good stories and I keep reading the books so I have to say there's something good going on there even if I can't fully articulate it.

 

 

The Last Man Takes LSD

I went to Graduate School in English about 20 years ago. Somehow, I didn't have to read much Foucault. I think I read Discipline and Punish but only on my own time.  We may have read some sort of excerpts in a larger theory class. But that doesn't mean I'm not kind of familiar with the concepts of the man because the postmodern, post-structuralist thinking, that he helped engineer was everywhere at the Academy at that time. Even if you were more structural, Marxist or something that wasn't as grounded in French theory you still had to deal with that environment.

 

That basically means that I don't have the full context to completely judge this book because it is somewhat of a biography and somewhat of an intellectual biography but also a criticism of his work. So, reading this I learned a lot about Foucault and his thought and the things he was involved in. But I can't say where the authors got it right where they got it wrong how much he was involved in the creation and strengthening and dissemination of what we now call neoliberalism. What I can say is that the subtitle means more to the structure of the book than the title. There is sadly very little about LSD and it's more about the fizzling out of revolutionary potentials. I'm glad I read this book and I think I learned a lot from it.

 

Recent Reads 8.4.2021

 Red State Revolt

The Jacobin and Verso partnership published a book based on the Chicago teachers strikes a while back. And then after 2018 they published a book about the broader teachers strikes that struck the nation. This is that book.

 

I really liked what Eric Blanc does mainly because even though he gets up close to the people who really worked with the strikes he doesn't over invest in them which for me would be very easy to do as a non-journalist. But you still do get a lot of empathy for the people. What makes this strong is his comparison of the strikes in West Virginia and Arizona versus the ones in Oklahoma. It makes it like points of comparison which could be useful as a handbook for future work.

 

The thing that makes me sad reading this is thinking about all the promise that we had based on Bernie’s run in 2016 and then the teacher strikes in 2018 and then it felt like a letdown as a member of the left that we didn't get more progress especially considering the pandemic. Reading it just felt as if we had something within our grasp that slipped away a moment in time in the ebbs and flows where you hope you could strike wear the iron is hot, but you miss. And it's not missing that's sad.

 

Puppy Dog Ice Cream

 

I don't normally buy a book that would be a biography of a band. But when I was a little bit younger Japanther became my favorite band. The problem was that the time that I was becoming a big fan of them it was at the very end of their cycle. I saw them at Riot Fest and then once later and then I had tickets for a show in the spring of 2014 and then I got an email that said they weren't going to do that tour. It made me very sad, and I didn't know why it happened.

 

So, the thing was getting this book and seeing it offered - I was excited at long last to see an explanation about what happened. My hope was that I would get an entire view of the whole arc of the band. Which is pretty much what this book’s got so that's good. The problem is that as a reader and a story once most interesting is the conflict period and what we have here is Ian's side of the whole thing and we don't really get mad side. So, the subtitle is the story of Japanther, but it's only half the story. I enjoyed reading it was a quick read, but I would like the sequel if it were Matt story of Japanther.

 

I don't mean to disparage what Ian did because the book itself is very well written and I think he is introspective and insightful about his own experience. I think if you were a fan of the band, you would enjoy this book.

 

The Secret to Superhuman Strength

 

I have been reading Allison Bechdel’s work for a while. It started with Fun Home, but I also circled back and read her comics. I think especially in her books Bechdel isn't necessarily just writing about the subject matter at hand. What she's really writing about is herself and her own inner journey. Nominally it could be about her mom or her dad or her lifelong exploration of different kinds of exercise, but really, it's just a journey inward looking at the self. Overall, it's not a bad journey and there's a very good reason that she is an award-winning author and artist -- it's that she really touches the soul, or the nub, she gets to the root of the problem. I don't know. Whatever it is that she does she's very good at it. If you like graphic novels and you like memoirs you are going to like The Secret to Superhuman Strength.

 

The only quibble I have is that I read the whole thing and I don't think I found what the secret was. But I do have to admit to sometimes being an inattentive reader, so perhaps it's in there and I just missed it.

Recent Reads 6.18.2021

 

Fear and Trembling

Okay so here's the thing I really can't tell what Kierkegaard  is going on about here. I read the whole book and thankfully it's a short book because there's all the stuff about Abraham and there's a bit about a merman and the ethics of listening to God to kill your own son.

Reading this made me think less about Abraham and more about both the directions given  by the deity and the son who would have been the sacrifice. I want to learn more about that position and a universe that accepts that as formally true and accepts it as a question of faith and not as fundamental Brokenness to the entire edifice of the mythology. Overall it was an interesting  and worthwhile read but if you really ask me exactly what I'd read and could synthesize a summary I probably couldn't.

Revolutionary Suicide

I really like reading this book because I got to learn more about the Black Panthers from Huey's perspective. I knew they were really interesting and had some good policies. I didn't realize just how awesome they were. But I think what Huey really covers is how much the white power structure goes against anyone who might push back against that power structure. 

So it was interesting to read but also kind of depressing because you saw how it all played out in the 60s. And you're reading it and you go oh wow this is very similar to how the world is today and hasn't changed that much. And that's the not fun feeling to have. 

I'd say that the only thing that really dragged about this book is the last 80% where he really covers his trials to the minute detail. It seems as if it was probably recent to the writing so it was well within his mind but I think it kind of goes against the broader structure and it's not as effective as some of the earlier chapters. Overall it made me want to learn more about the Black Panther Party and the history of Huey and his companions and how Eldridge Cleaver did him wrong.

Planet on Fire

This was a hard book to read Because I probably agree with all the descriptions of the problems they look at in the book. I agree that there is a emergency that we need to deal with on the climate front and that's embedded in an entire social and political structure that is fundamentally broken and will not fix the emergency on its own accord. 

The problem is that this book is written like a very well-written undergraduate paper. It talks about the problems and I kept wanting to say “well okay what is the mechanism that we use to fix these problems?”. Because to really address them as you mentioned earlier we have to fundamentally reshape the political and economic structures. So I'm reading it and I see at the very end of the kind of hand-wave towards it but even then I already made my decision about this book and so it didn't really strike me as a good strong mechanism for change.

Which is unfortunate because so many of these books are able to diagnose the problem and we can fall back on that world. That's like the quote we attributed to Jameson where it's easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism. If we don't end capitalism as we know it there's going to be a major dislocation in the political and economic social structures anyway in the later part of the century. It's very scary and depressing and it's something we need to do something about and I think I'm of the same boat as the authors here and not knowing exactly what we can do about it

Existentialism is a Humanism

This book serves as a pretty good introduction to the philosophy of existentialism. The core of it is a speech that Jean-Paul Sartre gave with the same title.  It's interesting because it's a short book anyway but the speech itself was so short that they had to wrap it up in an introduction, the Q&A of speech, and a separate commentary on The Stranger. It even includes something like a 10-page question from some other dude. It strikes me as the most exemplary example of the “This is more of a comment than a question" style question that you will ever see. In spite of all that it's still like 100 page book. So if you're interested in existentialism like I am it's not a bad thing to look up. I wouldn't be surprised if there is a PDF of the speech itself somewhere that you can just read. It might really do exactly what you need instead of this presentation format that I have from Yale. 

The Antifa Supersoldier Cookbook

Matt Lubchansky Is a National Treasure. They're probably the third or fourth best left-wing political cartoonist working today, at least in my opinion. I usually see their work through the neighborhood so it's nice that I was able to get this long-form version where we get to see help water a narrative Arc. It's really a smart look at the ongoing conflict between the citizens of America and the police we pay. That makes you laugh but also makes you a bit sad because it also shows the ongoing escalation that's not really necessary and it shouldn't be necessary but we kind of live in a police state which isn’t fun.

Diaspora Boy

I'm a fan of Eli Valley.  What his art is able to do is really make you uncomfortable. And it makes you uncomfortable because he's telling you the truth and he's showing you things as they are. 

I think it's a skill a lot of cartoonists don't really have. I think the other thing that I really like about him is his drawing style -  that real heavy dark line work I'm sure has the name but it reminds me of old school woodblock prints. So they're also very visually interesting. 

The book itself is actually kind of hard to read. And it's not because of subject matter but because of the very physicality of the book. It's printed as if they were printing a broadsheet page but it's much heavier than a broadsheet page so I had to lay it out on the table to thoroughly read it. The other piece about this specific text is that it is really focused on Jewishness and the Jewish experience as a left-wing American Jew and how to deal with the state of Israel and how it goes against so many of your ideals. Something I really like that Valley does here is that he includes short essays to give context to what was going on both in his career  and World politics of the time because there's a lot of deep cuts that if you're not hyper conscious and aware of what's going on within that specific context you'll only miss it.

Unfortunately the conflicts that Valley writes about are daily ongoing and they don't seem to have any resolution so that even though this book was published 4 years ago it still feels very timely I would recommend that you read it.

Let Us Now Praise Famous Men

There's a line from the preface to this book we're James Agee says but he's going to take his subject matter seriously.

It Is hard to find the cogent words to talk about this book.

It's not a novel, but it is novel.

See if you go look up the reviews you'll find confusion about what it is that Let Us Now Praise Famous Men was supposed to be about. And I have the same confusion. Ultimately I think this book is often lumped in with Grapes of Wrath not because they're stylistically the same or did they really kind of hit on the same subject matter or even though that's more parallel. But what I think Steinbeck has in common with James Agee is that they both took that subject matter seriously. If I could compare this book to anything in literature I think it is those interstitial chapters to Grapes of Wrath that aren’t specifically about the Joad family but that are trying to set the scene.

Because ultimately what this book is more than anything “about”  it's not about the sharecroppers it's nominally covering but I would say it's more a close reading of the land of the objects and the clothes and the things that they touch. More than anything it reminds me of that mid century literary criticism before the French broke everything but it's a literary criticism that applies to the physicality of the world. So it's kind of like a precursor to Barthes looking at the semiotics, the laundry detergent or whatever.

So It's a really interesting book but it's impossible to read cover-to-cover because it is like a kind of pastiche of bringing together notes and clipping. You don't get any kind of narrative arc but it's as if you're looking at a world from one inch away. I tried to understand it like that. I think it's a rightfully celebrated text but you have to understand it on its own terms and not try to see it as something else that you wanted to be. 

Cancel Student Loans

 I'm a bit of an untraditional case when it comes to student loans.

My wife and I met in graduate school where we were both working towards MAs in English. In 2007 she graduated, and I left the program without a degree. We moved to Chicago where we both got jobs. I was teaching and she was working with a website. In 2008 I lost my job and was unemployed until 2011. Thankfully, we didn't have much debt from the first round of school and managed to pay it off (about 15K total). There's a weird generational thing where when we first went to school it was like you can major in anything and get a job, but then we left graduate school right as the worst recession in our lifetimes to that point was starting. What the crash and the recession afterward really cemented was that in this modern economy you need to keep refreshing your skills (though I worry at some point I'll end up overqualified). So, once I got a job after being unemployed, I realized I needed to learn more stuff within the framework of that job and that agency. The problem is education is expensive. I started taking classes at a community college and in 2014 I started an MBA which I graduated from and then did an MA in Economics where I graduated last year.  My wife did a post-graduate certificate program for her work and is looking to extend that for her second Masters. We've been employed and taking out loans  and then paying them as we go but still owe close to 30K. 

Here's the weird thing that doesn't make me a sympathetic character - over the last year when they announced the moratorium I just opened a savings account and plowed money into that, We both kept our jobs and I got a raise and there was no commuting or leisure costs so we were able to put enough money away last year to be able to pay off our entire balance. It would be cool if they cancelled the debt because it means we can replace our windows or go on a real vacation.

Because what debt does is constrain. We have been married since 2008 and have never gone on a real vacation. When we have time off, we visit family and that's about it. When you have the monthly payments, it hangs over you and limits what you can do. Part of why we've never really entertained having children is the cost of childcare when you have other costs already. There's this paradox that you need to keep learning things to survive but that costs money, so you need to keep upping those skills. 

I support a cancellation of student debt but should just be a part of a much broader structural change because a lot of people have stories worse than mine and greater constraints, but we have generations behind us who will have the same needs. A cheap master's degree with face-to-face learning is between 30-40 K. There are programs with online delivery with lower price points, but there aren't many. And the other costs like housing and childcare and health care are only going up with our real wages mostly stagnate. Just a huge broken system. 

But - if cancellation is something that Biden can do unilaterally (and I think it is) then it is something he should do. Not only will it help so many people who have been trying to survive in this economy and economic system, but I would imagine it has electoral benefits.

The other final  thing to add is current policy creates uncertainty. They ran on forgiveness of some of the debt while others were pushing higher amounts. They rolled in and pushed back the start of repayment to the fall, but I was really hoping movement before then. But it's coming soon, and they want to spend their political capital on getting a bipartisan consensus on infrastructure which from where I am standing doesn't seem likely. Freeing up cash flow for borrowers, even if it spikes inflation some, should be a net good.

Uploading a couple graphs here to get a URL

 

The Search for Autonomy: Gavin Mueller's "Breaking Things at Work"

 
Okay today we're looking at Breaking Things at Work, the new book from Verso by Gavin Muller. It’s an interesting text because it's short and I was reading it and I wasn’t quite sure what to make of it. The first part is just the history of Luddism and industrial push-back from the early eighteen-hundreds to current but also includes the office environment.
 
The thing is it has one of the absolute best last chapters of any social science book that I've read. Usually, these last chapters are some sort of call to action that really you can't do much about, the problem they were looking at in the text is stuck as it is unless you go about really changing the entire system. 
 
I think where Mueller really excels is where he hits on his sense of autonomy. The whole point of the book is that it is not having autonomy where you have the freedom to work on your own terms is where the push-back begins. 
 

Quick story: I worked at a pizza shop. I tried to make my work like art. By creating each pizza as a little piece of art it felt as if I had control over what I was doing. I didn’t get paid anywhere comparable to the amount of my productivity over most of my co-workers because I was good, and I was fast. But  I was able to do the work on my own terms. Then my boss decided to put a scale in and really regiment just the amount of cheese we were adding. Which makes sense from a business perspective because you want to make sure all your products are consistent and to cut down on your food cost, so the people don’t add too much cheese. But that constraint really made everybody mad, especially the fact that at the same time they installed a bunch of cameras in the store and the far as I remember there were installed it like three cameras in the kitchen for everyone camera in the dining room and we were open late night that we have a lot of problems with. Our boss was less concerned about that then being able to exert control internally and I think what Mueller is thinking is something like this. The autonomy is what controls being able to do things on your own terms as you like them and not fully controlled. 
 
What we have is a lack of Freedom where the employee is the tool instead of using technology as the tool itself. And that's where we get this larger unrest and a lack of satisfaction, needing meaning at work. The other thing that Mueller does well is that he doesn't claim to have a big answer. What we really need  to create that autonomy is to have some sort of organization at the firm level or even at a higher level of the social political organization. I really liked the book in the end even though the first part I was a little unsure about what he was trying to do. It all came together well.
 

On "The Care Crisis" by Emma Dowling

Today I'm going to talk about the Care Crisis by Emma Dowling. It is a new release from Verso and the subtitle “is what caused it and how can we end it”. Overall it's a pretty good book. It does identify a lot of the problems with our caring organizations from the elderly all the way on down to the youth. I think the big problem for me with this book was that it was more focused on the British context. And they fund their care a little bit differently than we do here in America. But what we do have in common is that there is a lack of funding and support for the organization of the people who do care in both countries.

This of course is a little bit is a bit disappointing because I think there's an idea that the European system and model is a little bit better in terms of healthcare. But especially in the English context we've seen how neoliberalism has brought its Market upon everything.

The English have less distributed governments in terms of taxing. They have their local Council but they're reliant on getting grants from the central government and these grants have been cut over time so the organizations that are reliant on funding for them are just in trouble. Here in America I know personally I work for a caring organization and though we have multiple funding streams that complicate our financials if there is a cut from our funders we have other fullbacks. That's less so here in the context that Dowling describes. So what happens is there's less time and people are more stretched and people that need care either don't get it or it's at a substandard level.

When this book is at its strongest it is in describing the various problems we have with the caring organizations. It does fall off a little at the end, the last two chapters. The penultimate chapter is one that talks about self-care and it kind of feels like it's from left field and doesn't fit in with the rest of the book really. And then the final chapter is the inevitable what is to be done chapter and it just doesn't feel as if there is a way to push back against neoliberalism because it is working within that context and really the entire social system and economic system needs to be reformed and unfortunately I don’t think it's going to happen tomorrow. But overall it's a worthwhile read.

Lawrence Summers Can Eat My Ass

 I have a lot of feelings about the man, mostly negative. He's out of touch and in spite of everyone who says he's brilliant, he's done a net harm to the country and the Economics profession by devaluing it as a policy making tool. To be fair that last part just wasn't him. For all that he's done over his career, he can eat my entire ass. 

Pushing Back on Neoliberalism: Mike Konczal's "Freedom From the Market"

 This is a good, short book laying out many of the ways that the market has crept up on us and made our lives smaller.

Konczal provides necessary pushback to the neoliberal project, showing just everything that we have lost as the forces of capital decided that the Great Society, the New Deal, and the Progressive Era were bridges too far against the corporate form.