The “rational class consciousness'”
hypothesis is that in a class-based model, each class, besides being modeled,
will use the model to decide upon how it should act. Discuss the implications
of this hypothesis when it is applied in a Goodwin-Mehrling style model.
The
rational class consciousness is in looking at a model and using it to shape how
you act. If we take the Goodwin-Mehrling model, we can see that there are the
four outcomes that they model. Goodwin models the business cycle as wage shares
go up and down while unemployment goes down and then up, baring a special case
where unemployment and wages shares somehow hit on an equilibrium point and
stay there. Mehrling extends this model and says what if the classes are not
acting as autonomous individuals, but instead worked together. Through this assumption
(and several others), he models three other outcomes. There are three
possibilities. Two where the individual classes bargain as a class and where the
opposite class bargains separately and a third possibility where both classes bargain.
These
three possibilities have different outcomes in terms of wage share and
unemployment. If the capitalists bargain as a class and the workers bargain
alone, the system operates in a situation where the capitalists share of output
is the great majority and the workers only get enough to socially reproduce
(iron law of wages here?). Even with the lowered wage share, the workers will
still see unemployment in this model. If the opposite happens and the workers
are united and the many small businesses organize on their own, unemployment
does not exist, and the worker wage share is increased. It is in the third case
where both classes bargain as one where the best outcome happens for both
classes. There is full employment and the business class gets more of the wage
share than if they did not organize.
No comments:
Post a Comment