For the month of October, the unemployment
rate dropped to 5.8%, the lowest rate in recent memory. Unemployment had been
higher than it had been in a generation, topping out at 10%. The graph below
shows the progress in the unemployment rate for the last ten years, showing its
increase during the recession and the slow climb down to a more natural rate of
unemployment.
Figure One |
The steady
decline of the last few years might be a cause for celebration, but two recent
articles have found that the headline number is not the end of the story.
Americans still have concerns about the labor market, in spite of the good news
coming from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
The first
article is “Why Many Aren’t Celebrating Low US Unemployment,” by Josh Boak, an
economics writer for the Associated Press. The article was published on the ABC
News website. In his article, Boak looks at the current unemployment rate and
tries to unravel the disconnect between the low unemployment rate and the
current sentiment about the state of the economy. He leads off his article by
noting how exit polls showed that a majority of the voters surveyed said that
they cast their ballots based on “fear for the economy” (Boak 2014). He further
explores the fact that the low unemployment rate is not the only piece of good
news for the economy lately, specifically pointing out that home sales and auto
sales have increased (Boak 2014)
The good economic news is tempered
by the fact that pay is increasing, but only in line with the low inflation
that has been a part of the current recovery. This lack of growth has created
the perception that worker’s standard of living are declining. This perception
is compounded by another metric. Boak points out that the labor force
participation rate has been stagnant for the last year, and has decreased since
2008. This bad news more than balances out the good news that is available. He
cites polling done after the election showing “Roughly two thirds of those
surveyed described the economy as ‘getting worse’ or ‘staying about the same.’
And 78 percent declared themselves worried about the direction of the economy”
(Boak 2014). The worry will continue, as Boak ends his article citing an
economist saying that wages will not grow fast for a while.
Joining the chorus in a structurally
similar article, Patricia Cohen wrote in the New York Times an article titled
“Jobs Data Show Steady Gains, but Stagnant Wages Temper Optimism.” In her article, Cohen cites the same job
growth data Boak looked at, where unemployment is dropping and jobs are being
added to the economy. She then turns and looks at some of the other issues that
are bringing down the American worker’s morale. First, she looks at wage
growth, where they have increased only two percent in the last year but almost
not at all in the last couple of months. She then looks at the labor force
participation rate that Boak looked at, bit she focuses on a slight uptick of
the rate to 62.8 percent where Boak claimed that it had not moved. This
increases gives Cohen some optimism, and she looks elsewhere in the economy to corroborate
it, point out the ending of the Federal Reserve’s decision to end the most
recent round of quantitative easing (Cohen 2014).
Still, in spite of the good news,
Cohen identifies that Americans are not that optimistic about the economy. She
looks at the fact that productivity gains have not gone to workers like they
had decades ago. She also looks at the optics of highly paid chief executive
officers making many multiples of workers’ salaries. She then cites the same
survey Book does in looking at Americans’ optimism about the future of the
economy – a solid majority is not confident (Cohen 2014).
Cohen gets deeper in trying to
understand this divide than Boak does. She looks at the quality of the new jobs
that have been created and which are pushing down the unemployment rate. She
finds that part of the malaise in the job situation is that so many of the new
jobs are low paid jobs in the service and hospitality sectors. These jobs have
little bargaining power and thus they cannot help force wages up, a move which
would make people happier about the state of the economy (Cohen 2014). She also
looks at the persistence of long-term unemployment and the weakness in the
world economy.
Overall, Cohen strikes a much more
optimistic note about the short-run path of the economy. Where Boak ends his
article looking at the possibility of persistence of low wages, Cohen ends her
article on a bright note, quoting an economist saying, “It definitely looks
like things are slowly moving in the right direction” (Sinclair qtd in Cohen
2014).
Both of these articles looked at the
current unemployment situation and saw that though the news has been getting
better, most people are still apprehensive about the state of the economy.
Things are quantitatively getting better, but the perception of stagnation and
even recession persists. What neither Boak nor Cohen touches on are ways to
move the perception from backward-looking gloom to forward-looking optimism.
One way to improve the public’s
perception of the economy is to shrink unemployment even more. Looking at
figure one, it is still above the trough that was reached in the last
expansion. The easiest way to do that is to remove whatever structural
employment exists. The minimum wage and labor unions create a wage floor that
keeps the labor market from clearing (Krugman & Wells p. 222). If these
artificial constraints on the labor market were cleared, then the equilibrium
would be able to be reached. One thing to consider in that possibility though
is that the natural rate of unemployment may have grown since the last
expansion due to demographic factors. With the baby boom generation leaving the
labor force, even a more flexible labor market may not lower unemployment enough
to compensate for the political fall-out of such a move (Krugman & Wells p.
226).
The preferable alternative to
removing labor market protections is to foster a environment of growth. By
looking at what the government can do to grow the economy, the people in the
heartland will feel the economy growing by seeing it on their paychecks. At a
time when the people are scared about the economy is the best time to fund
infrastructure, education, and research (Krugman & Wells p. 257). Taking an “All of the above” approach will
help in the long and the short run. The next time those polls are taken; there
can be some movement on how many are fearful of the future.
References
Boak,
J. ( 2014, Nov 8). Why many aren’t celebrating low US unemployment. ABC News. Retrieved from
http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/celebrating- low- us-unemployment-26776012
Cohen,
P. (2014, Nov 7). Jobs data shows steady gains, but stagnant wages temper Optimism. The New York Times.
Retrieved from
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/08/business/jobs-numbers-for-october-2014-reported-by-labor-epartment.html?_r=1
Federal
Reserve Economic Data. (2014). Graph: Civilian Unemployment Rate. Retrieved
from http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/graph/?id=UNRATE,
Krugman,
P. & Wells, R. (2013). Macroeconomics. New York, NY : Worth Publishers
No comments:
Post a Comment