Level One
I’m finishing up my MBA. It is mid-march, and I will
graduate in May. Though I have learned a lot, much of what we learned in the
classes is on the higher level. What has been specific has been
subject-specific. There isn’t much about the self-help about the classes or the
books. That’s where I have found Drucker useful for my own knowledge as an
independent thing to study. This is the second book I have read by him, and
there are a lot of useful take-aways even if the book is horribly dated, (there’s
only tangential reference to computers and it assumes that all
knowledge-workers are men). Basically everyone can learn to be effective through
self-knowledge about things as if such as how you actually spend your time versus
how you think you spend your time. I’ve been doing a basic form of this in my
own life, tracking just what I spend my time on at work for the past couple of
years now in just an excel spreadsheet. There is also the need to know your strength
and to build on that to contribute the best you can. Overall, as a work
self-help book, it is one that you can read and find points of takeaway.
Reading the book is one that is an interactive process because reading it made
me think of my own life and how it applied how I could use the book to make
myself more effective. It is a very practical text.
The second level
The other way to read this, and it didn’t strike me until I
was almost done is that books like this are such that makes the aspiring effective
executive one that is complicit in their own exploitation. Where in the early
part of the 1900s, the working classes had scientific management forced upon
them in the guise of making them more effective, the timekeeping is instead
given to the executive so that they can do their own time and motion studies in
the Taylorism of the white-collar worker. In this view, the book and the peers
of the writer are ones that have an insidious agenda, because it assumes that the
worker is one that is within a large organization and the goal is to maximize profit
and not human flourishing. Or maybe I’ve just read “Labor and Monopoly Capital”
too recently.
No comments:
Post a Comment