In The Open Veins of Latin America, Eduardo
Galeano details the centuries of extraction that that colonizing European
powers exercised over the land and the peoples of Latin America. In the chapter
“Lust for Gold, Lust for Silver,” Galeano highlights the purely extractive
nature of this colonization. In reading, I learned several things that I did not
know. The first being that often the colonization was often not a state endeavor,
but one in which adventurers set out to make their names and their riches, but
they need capital for boats and men to cross over with (14). The other thing
was just how small the initial crews were who were so accomplished in being able
to lay waste to the indigenous populations because of their more advanced
weaponry, horses, and germs they carried with them, on purpose or not: “Cortez landed
at Veracruz with nor more than 100 sailors and 508 soldiers; he had 16 horses
32 crossbows, 10 bronze cannon, a few harquebuses, muskets, and pistols” (16).
What is striking about reading Galeano is that despite
reading alternative texts like Zinn’s People’s
History or Loewen’s Lies My Teacher Told
Me is that the narrative I grew up with was based on North America, but it
was more than that, it was a triumphal history of conquest. In America, we tell
the stories of the Jamestown settlers or the Pilgrims outside of Boston and how
they interacted with the natives. In one narrative, Squanto, who is famous for
helping the Pilgrims is someone to be celebrated. But Squanto from another
light is a race-traitor, allowing the white people to come in and take over the
villages that had been abandoned because a plague wiped out all the native
people. We do not know the stories of the native people because in part they
had no writing. They had no one to tell their story of a plague that was on par
or worse than the fourteenth century European Black Death. But they had no one
to tell their story because they were the losers in the tale. We do not hear about
them on the other hand because to think of them, or the victims of our four
centuries of “Indian Removal” make the narrative less triumphalist.
Galeano’s book is hard to read because of its detail.
The problem is the detail is just one horrible thing after another about how
the native peoples were treated. They died from contact, they died from war,
they were enslaved in horrible conditions – and why? The goal was to pull a shiny
metal from the earth. They took the treasures of the Incas and the Aztecs and “reduced
it and made it bars” (19). Details like that make the contemporary reader shake
their head in wonder at all that was lost culturally to go on top of lamenting
the horrible conditions. You read of “Many natives of Haiti [who] anticipated
the fate imposed by their white oppressors: they killed their children and committed
mass suicide” (15). Reading those details makes me ask what we would do as a
culture with a similar narrative. What would humans do if they met a similarly malevolent
alien species, intent on using us as slaves? The stories we tell ourselves continue
that triumphalism. In our movies, we fight back and defeat the aliens though unique
human creativity or moxie. But the reality is that with novel pathogens and
weapons, it would be hard to fight back. The ones who ended their lives may be
more heroic than we know. Unfortunately, we westerners inherited the taboo
against suicide, so that may be a harder act to undertake. Here is to hope that
no aliens with bad intentions invade in my lifetime. That is a choice I do not want to have to make.
Works Cited
Cypher,
J. M. (2014). The process of economic development. London: Routledge, Taylor
& Francis Group.
Belfrage,
C., & Galeano, E. H. (1997). Open Veins of Latin America: Five Centuries of
the Pillage of a Continent. Monthly Review Foundation Incorporated.
No comments:
Post a Comment