If I were building a country, and I wanted it to be
successful, in the 19th century and before, I would want to make
sure it had natural resources – forests or coal or sheltered coastline.
Today, success is more about the institutions and
the people that are in them.
As such, the first goal of a country should be to
build human capital. This means that education is paramount. Early education
needs to be funded, and the universities need to be strong.
You also need these people to be healthy. One thing
to focus on would be infant mortality. A successful country will have a longer
life span, but a lot of that is just cutting infant mortality. Possibly look at
life expectancy at a certain age.
Also we need to make sure that infrastructure and
physical capital are built out, but that is harder to quantify. The physical
capital needs to go hand in hand with the human capital and the universities
(and private R&D) to fund technical innovation.
All this needs to theoretically take place where markets have low
barriers to entry and are open and transparent and free – ie Economically free
per the heritage foundation
Thing that gets me though, is the role of
institutions. In “Why Nations Fail” Acemoglu and Robinson talk about the
role of institutions in creating a successful country. The reason Mexico didn’t
succeed with a lot of the starting points the U.S. did was the institutions
that we had, like English Common Law.
Also, I would want an independent, rules-based
central bank and to issue my own currency.
And then we wait for Capitalism to fall from its inherent contradictions, and the rise of socialism and the eventual withering away of the state.
No comments:
Post a Comment